Unpopular opinions3

The best thing AI can do is destroy humanity. If there's no chance of getting sex or money as a thank you, you shouldn't help girls. The trend for tans, thick lips, and the like was paid for by people who already look that way. Alcohol is better than women because getting drunk is orders of magnitude cheaper and easier than picking up or finding a girl. The intelligence of a single human is lower than that of the average animal of comparable weight, and all the cool stuff we have is only due to our anthill-like connections. Moreover, any attempt to measure animal intelligence would be fraudulent: an animal doesn't take out a 20-year mortgage, doesn't work, doesn't gamble, and during the mating season, the one who chases a male away from a female fucks her himself, rather than enduring her in the name of chivalrous ideals. This is enough to be smarter than everyone except video bloggers, only-lifers, and millionaires. The only way to win in a direct social conflict is conformity, trust in authority, and a strict adherence to current trends. Almost all problems can be solved effectively with either money or violence. But they are usually forbidden to solve this way, even if any other approach is a thousand times more expensive. All electronics, photography, and audio recording devices were originally created as a way to reduce anonymity. You have a photo of your great-grandfather; he's not a faceless name. The thrill of possessing knowledge should be followed by the horror that others will also have it. But on average, people think a few steps ahead at best, while an anthill is hundreds of steps ahead. It's better to be useless and tolerated than useful and taken advantage of. The greater the power, the less responsibility. The "guilty" is almost always a scapegoat. The very concept of law as a science is utter nonsense. All laws are simply an ordered list of the bosses' wishes. More precisely, the inhuman will of an anthill, exerting equal pressure on the queen, drones, and workers. Morality is an absolute psychopath. If you look at human society objectively, we are just as cruel as any insect (mammals are much more humane). He who speaks does not act, he who does does not speak. I'm referring to cynical ways to improve life or harm those you don't love. Reading Russian classics is embarrassing, so I recently learned from a streamer that Raskolnikov gave up because his conscience was bothering him. So, that's what losers like me do: if they do something that benefits themselves in an unethical way, they sabotage everything and lose. Conscience is a collection of your enemies who persuade you to sacrifice your own interests for theirs, even though their entire well-being is truly as pleasant as a cheap, frosted cheesecake. Everything else is just thoughts in your head that will shame you for acting in your own best interest. Axiom of bullshit: nothing interesting ever happens in the world. You can entertain yourself, you can watch things specifically created to entertain. But everything else only happens in the news. By the way, one of the signs of a schizophrenic is the inability to understand proverbs and sayings. I only just now learned that "might is brains" doesn't mean that all problems can be solved by brute force, if there's enough of it. However, I still believe my version is true. How do the meme "the only free cheese is in a mousetrap" reconcile with the fact that people pathologically adore everything free? Historically, only the suckers who managed to scam someone—for example, by toiling away their entire lives in exchange for a raped wife and a beating on Fridays—survived and reproduced. Verbal safeguards are only needed for blatantly obvious scams, which, if taken in, would quickly wipe out the population. A real standard of living should be measured by the ability to fuck, walk through the forest with a stick, and drink clean spring water. And also by being able to light a fire with branches, lie in bed, and not work.